02481cam a2200349 a 45000010008000000030008000080050017000160080041000330100013000740200032000870200026001190200022001450200034001670200030002010200019002310200020002500200031002700350012003010400038003130500022003510820021003731000021003942450064004152600081004793000026005605040064005865050479006505200905011296500053020346500022020876500022021091591474BD-DhUL20160508153756.0970312s1996    enk      b    001 0 eng    a95014914  a0333560450qclothqhardback  a0312173067qpaperback  a0312128479qcloth  a0333657551qpaperbackc$16.99  a0333657551qUKqpaperback  a0333560450qUK  a0312128479qU.S  a0312173067qU.Sqpaperback  a1591474  aDUP:JbengcDUP:JdDUP:JdBD-DhUL00aHC79.R4bK43 199604a330.072220bKEE1 aKealey, Terence.14aThe economic laws of scientific research /cTerence Kealey.  aBasingstoke [England] :bMacmillan ;aNew York :bSt. Martin's Press,c1996.  axii, 382 p. ;c22 cm.  aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 354-368) and index.0 a1. Francis Bacon and Adam Smith -- 2. Research and Development in Antiquity -- 3. The So-called Dark Ages -- 4. The Commercial Revolution -- 5. The Agricultural Revolution -- 6. The Industrial Revolution -- 7. Economic History since 1870 -- 8. Science Policies of the Twentieth Century -- 9. The Economics of Research: Why the Linear Model Fails -- 10. The Real Economics of Research -- 11. The So-called Decline of British and American Science -- 12. Dr Pangloss was Right.  aDuring the 1980s Terence Kealey was universally derided for his claims that British and American science were expanding fast. Everyone else thought that they were in decline. He has been vindicated, but he had an unfair advantage; he knew the economic laws of scientific research and his critics did not. This book now makes them available to all. If state-funded research promotes economic, cultural or even scientific growth, why do Japan and Switzerland flourish in its near-absence while Russia and India have stagnated in a sea of government largesse? Why has Britain's relative economic decline, and that of America, coincided with their government's funding of research? Assessing the evidence from international comparisons and historical research, Terence Kealey shows how the free market approach has proved by far the most successful in promoting science, innovation, wealth and happiness. 0aResearch, IndustrialxEconomic aspectsxHistory. 0aSciencexHistory. 0aEconomic history.