<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01461nam a2200325 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">EDZ0000076885</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">StDuBDS</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20150804193935.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m||||||||d||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr||||||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">100819s2010    enk    fo     001 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780191594236 (ebook) :</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">No price</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">StDuBDS</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">StDuBDS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">BD161</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">121</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">22</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Disagreement</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">[electronic resource] /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">edited by Richard Feldman, Ted A. Warfield.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Oxford :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Oxford University Press,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2010.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1 online resource.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Disagreement is common: even informed, intelligent, &amp; generally reasonable people often come to different conclusions when confronted with what seems to be the same evidence. Can the competing conclusions be reasonable? If not, what can we reasonably think about the situation? This book covers the epistemology of disagreement.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed Sept. 7, 2010).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Knowledge, Theory of.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Verbal self-defense</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Philosophy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Compromise (Ethics)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Dogmatism</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Philosophy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Feldman, Richard,</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1948-</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Warfield, Ted A.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1969-</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8">
    <subfield code="i">Print version</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">9780199226078</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="3">Oxford scholarship online</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.001.0001</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">37621</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">37621</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
