<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01309nam a2200289 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">EDZ0000115751</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">StDuBDS</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20150804193924.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m||||||||d||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr||||||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">121220s2012    enk    fo|    001 0 eng|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780191741968 (ebook) :</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">No price</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">StDuBDS</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">StDuBDS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">B105.M4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">121.68</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gibbard, Allan.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Meaning and normativity</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">[electronic resource] /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Allan Gibbard.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Oxford :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Oxford University Press,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2012.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1 online resource.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The concepts of meaning and mental content resist naturalistic analysis. This is because they are normative: they depend on ideas of how things ought to be. This text offers an explanation of these 'oughts', borrowing devices from metaethics to illuminate deep problems at the heart of the philosophy of language and thought.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on Jan. 4, 2013).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Meaning (Philosophy)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Normativity (Ethics)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8">
    <subfield code="i">Print version</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">9780199646074</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="3">Oxford scholarship online</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646074.001.0001</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">36867</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">36867</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
