<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<metadata
  xmlns="http://example.org/myapp/"
  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xsi:schemaLocation="http://example.org/myapp/ http://example.org/myapp/schema.xsd"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><dc:Title>Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation : issues in philosophy and psychology / [electronic resource]  [edited by] Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack, and Sarah R. Beck.</dc:Title>
<dc:Creator>Hoerl, Christoph.</dc:Creator>
<dc:Creator>McCormack, Teresa.</dc:Creator>
<dc:Creator>Beck, Sarah.</dc:Creator>
<dc:Subject>Causation.</dc:Subject>
<dc:Subject>Counterfactuals (Logic)</dc:Subject>
<dc:Subject>BD541</dc:Subject>
<dc:Subject>122 23</dc:Subject>
<dc:Description>Includes bibliographical references and index.</dc:Description>
<dc:Description>Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed on Jan. 20, 2012).</dc:Description>
<dc:Description>How are causal judgements such as 'the ice on the road caused the traffic accident' connected with judgements such as 'if there had not been any ice on the road, the traffic accident would not have happened'? This book looks at this question by uniting psychological and philosophical approaches to causation and counterfactuals.</dc:Description>
<dc:Publisher>Oxford : Oxford University Press,</dc:Publisher>
<dc:Date>2011.</dc:Date>
<dc:Date>2011.</dc:Date>
<dc:Date>2011</dc:Date>
<dc:Type>Text</dc:Type>
<dc:Format>1 online resource.</dc:Format>
<dc:Identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590698.001.0001</dc:Identifier>
<dc:Language>eng</dc:Language>
<dc:Relation>Also issued in print format.</dc:Relation>
<dc:Relation>Also issued in print format.</dc:Relation>

</metadata>