<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02343nam a22003378a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">CR9781139005081</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">UkCbUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180107143414.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m|||||o||d||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr||||||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">110131s2013||||enk     s     ||1 0|eng|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9781139005081 (ebook)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="z">9781107013643 (hardback)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="z">9781107619067 (paperback)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UkCbUP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UkCbUP</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">KTL2620 </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">.R68 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">347.68/035</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Roux, Theunis,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">The Politics of Principle :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">The First South African Constitutional Court, 1995&#x2013;2005 / [electronic resource]</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Theunis Roux.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Cambridge :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2013.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1 online resource (450 pages) :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">digital, PDF file(s).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">txt</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">c</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">online resource</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">cr</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. 6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Oct 2015).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Under its first chief justice, Arthur Chaskalson, the South African Constitutional Court built an unrivalled reputation in the comparative constitutional law community for technically accomplished and morally enlightened decision-making. At the same time, the Court proved remarkably effective in asserting its institutional role in post-apartheid politics. While each of these accomplishments is noteworthy in its own right, the Court's simultaneous success in legal and political terms demands separate investigation. Drawing on and synthesising various insights from judicial politics and legal theory, this study offers an interdisciplinary explanation for the Chaskalson Court's achievement. Rather than a purely political strategy of the kind modelled by rational choice theorists, the study argues that the Court's achievement is attributable to a series of adjudicative strategies in different areas of law. In combination, these strategies allowed the Court to satisfy institutional norms of public reason-giving while at the same time avoiding political attack.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8">
    <subfield code="i">Print version: </subfield>
    <subfield code="z">9781107013643</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. 6.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005081</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Cambridge Books Online</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">236646</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">236646</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
