<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <nonSort>The </nonSort>
    <title>Language of Law and the Foundations of American Constitutionalism / [electronic resource]</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <titleInfo type="alternative">
    <title>The Language of Law &amp; the Foundations of American Constitutionalism</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>McDowell, Gary L.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">enk</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2010</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <extent>1 online resource (428 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>For much of its history, the interpretation of the United States Constitution presupposed judges seeking the meaning of the text and the original intentions behind that text, a process that was deemed by Chief Justice John Marshall to be 'the most sacred rule of interpretation'. Since the end of the nineteenth century, a radically new understanding has developed in which the moral intuition of the judges is allowed to supplant the Constitution's original meaning as the foundation of interpretation. The Founders' Constitution of fixed and permanent meaning has been replaced by the idea of a 'living' or evolving constitution. Gary L. McDowell refutes this new understanding, recovering the theoretical grounds of the original Constitution as understood by those who framed and ratified it. It was, he argues, the intention of the Founders that the judiciary must be bound by the original meaning of the Constitution when interpreting it.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Gary L. McDowell.</note>
  <note>Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Oct 2015).</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Constitutional law</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">KF4550  .M33 2010</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="22">342.73</classification>
  <relatedItem type="otherFormat" displayLabel="Print version: "/>
  <identifier type="isbn">9780511761508 (ebook)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="uri">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761508</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761508</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UkCbUP</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">100506</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20180107143412.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="UkCbUP">CR9780511761508</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
