<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <nonSort>The </nonSort>
    <title>Early Textual History of Lucretius' De rerum natura / [electronic resource]</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Butterfield, David</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">enk</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2013</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <extent>1 online resource (368 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This is the first detailed analysis of the fate of Lucretius' De rerum natura from its composition in the 50s BC to the creation of our earliest extant manuscripts during the Carolingian Age. Close investigation of the knowledge of Lucretius' poem among writers throughout the Roman and medieval world allows fresh insight into the work's readership and reception, and a clear assessment of the indirect tradition's value for editing the poem. The first extended analysis of the 170+ subject headings (capitula) that intersperse the text reveals the close engagement of its Roman readers. A fresh inspection and assignation of marginal hands in the poem's most important manuscript (the Oblongus) provides new evidence about the work of Carolingian correctors and offers the basis for a new Lucretian stemma codicum. Further clarification of the interrelationship of Lucretius' Renaissance manuscripts gives additional evidence of the poem's reception and circulation in fifteenth-century Italy.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">David Butterfield.</note>
  <note>Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Oct 2015).</note>
  <classification authority="lcc">PA6484  .B88 2013</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">187</classification>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Cambridge Classical Studies</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <relatedItem type="otherFormat" displayLabel="Print version: "/>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Cambridge Classical Studies</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="isbn">9781139775403 (ebook)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="uri">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139775403</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139775403</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UkCbUP</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">120917</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20180107143410.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="UkCbUP">CR9781139775403</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
