<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Learn to Write Badly</title>
    <subTitle>How to Succeed in the Social Sciences / [electronic resource]</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Billig, Michael</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">enk</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2013</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <extent>1 online resource (244 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Modern academia is increasingly competitive yet the writing style of social scientists is routinely poor and continues to deteriorate. Are social science postgraduates being taught to write poorly? What conditions adversely affect the way they write? And which linguistic features contribute towards this bad writing? Michael Billig's witty and entertaining book analyses these questions in a quest to pinpoint exactly what is going wrong with the way social scientists write. Using examples from diverse fields such as linguistics, sociology and experimental social psychology, Billig shows how technical terminology is regularly less precise than simpler language. He demonstrates that there are linguistic problems with the noun-based terminology that social scientists habitually use - 'reification' or 'nominalization' rather than the corresponding verbs 'reify' or 'nominalize'. According to Billig, social scientists not only use their terminology to exaggerate and to conceal, but also to promote themselves and their work.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Michael Billig.</note>
  <note>Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Oct 2015).</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Communication in the social sciences</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">H61.8  .B55 2013</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">808.06/63</classification>
  <relatedItem type="otherFormat" displayLabel="Print version: "/>
  <identifier type="isbn">9781139208833 (ebook)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="uri">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208833</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208833</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UkCbUP</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">111209</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20180107143410.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="UkCbUP">CR9781139208833</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
