<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Indian English and the Fiction of National Literature / [electronic resource]</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <titleInfo type="alternative">
    <title>Indian English &amp; the Fiction of National Literature</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>George, Rosemary Marangoly</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">enk</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2013</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <extent>1 online resource (294 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>During the twentieth century, at the height of the independence movement and after, Indian literary writing in English was entrusted with the task of consolidating the image of a unified, seemingly caste-free, modernising India for consumption both at home and abroad. This led to a critical insistence on the proximity of the national and the literary, which in turn, led to the canonisation of certain writers and themes and the dismissal of others. Examining English anthologies of 'Indian literature', as well as the establishment of the Sahitya Akademi (the national academy of letters) and the work of R. K. Narayan and Mulk Raj Anand among others, Rosemary George exposes the painstaking efforts that went into the elaboration of a 'national literature' in English for independent India even while deliberating the fundamental limitations of using a nation-centric critical framework for reading literary works.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Rosemary Marangoly George.</note>
  <note>Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Oct 2015).</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>National characteristics, East Indian, in literature</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Group identity in literature</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">PR9485.5.N27  G46 2013</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">820.9/954</classification>
  <relatedItem type="otherFormat" displayLabel="Print version: "/>
  <identifier type="isbn">9781139626903 (ebook)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn" invalid="yes"/>
  <identifier type="uri">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626903</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626903</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UkCbUP</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">121122</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20171019154622.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="UkCbUP">CR9781139626903</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
