<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Philosophy of science in the twentieth century</title>
    <subTitle>four central themes</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Gillies, Donald.</namePart>
    <namePart type="date">1944-</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">bibliography</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">enk</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Blackwell</publisher>
    <dateIssued>c1993</dateIssued>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">1993</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>xv, 251 p. : 24 cm.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <tableOfContents>Pt. I. Inductivism and its Critics. 1. Some Historical Background: Inductivism, Russell and the Cambridge School, the Vienna Circle and Popper. 2. Popper's Critique of Inductivism. His Theory of Conjectures and Refutations (or Falsificationism). 3. Duhem's Critique of Inductivism -- Pt. II. Conventionalism and the Duhem-Quine Thesis. 4. Poincare's Conventionalism of 1902. 5. The Duhem Thesis and the Quine Thesis -- Pt. III. The Nature of Observation. 6. Protocol Sentences. 7. Is Observation Theory-Laden? -- Pt. IV. The Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics. 8. Is Metaphysics Meaningless? Wittgenstein, the Vienna Circle, and Popper's Critique. 9. Metaphysics in Relation to Science: The Views of Popper, Duhem, and Quine. 10. Falsificationism in the Light of the Duhem-Quine Thesis.</tableOfContents>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Donald Gillies.</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references (p. [238]-244) and index.</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Science</topic>
    <topic>Philosophy</topic>
    <topic>History</topic>
    <temporal>20th century</temporal>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">Q174.8 .G55 1993</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="20">501 GIP</classification>
  <identifier type="isbn">0631158642</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn">0631183582</identifier>
  <identifier type="lccn">92036318</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">ANL</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">920923</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20161208102047.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="BD-DhUL">1152587</recordIdentifier>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
