Library Logo
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Radical interactionism on the rise [electronic resource] /

by Athens, Lonnie H.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: Studies in symbolic interaction: v. 41.Publisher: Bingley, U.K. : Emerald, 2013Description: 1 online resource (xi, 246 p.) : ill.ISBN: 9781781907856 (electronic bk.) :.Subject(s): Social Science -- Sociology -- General | Social Science -- General | Social interaction | Society & culture: general | Social interaction | Symbolic interactionismOnline resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
Radical interactionism / Norman K. Denzin -- "Radical" and "symbolic" interactionism : demarcating their borders / Lonnie H. Athens -- Mead's conception of the social act : a radical interactionist's critique / Lonnie H. Athens -- Toward a radical interactionist account of science / Antony J. Puddephatt -- Domination and resistance : the political theory of John Dewey / Gil Richard Musolf -- Revisiting learning to labor / Matthew Gougherty, Tim Hallett -- Dominance, deference, and demeanor in mad men / Michael A. Katovich -- Reflections on power and intersectionality / Caroline Joan S. Picart -- The best road for pragmatism : neo-pragmatism or radical interactionism? / James A. Shaw.
Summary: This issue focuses on "radical interactionism". which recent emergence as an alternative perspective to conventional symbolic interactionism has sparked fierce debate in both North America and Europe. Lonnie Athens discusses the four fundamental differences between radical and conventional symbolic interactionism. The prominent scholars compare the relative insights offered not only between radical interactionism and symbolic interactionism, but between radical interactionism and feminism, dramaturgy, critical studies, and neo-pragmatism. Without exception, they found the radical interactionism revealed new and formidable insights that improved our general understanding of human group life and critical problems that arise during it. While some contributors believe that radical interactionism marks the development of a new and more vibrant form of interactionism which in due time will replace its much older and more conservative cousin, others believe that it only signals the need for traditional interactionists to finally start making some much-needed modifications in symbolic interactionism if they wish it to remain a viable sociological perspective in the 21st century.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Add tag(s)
Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Includes index.

Radical interactionism / Norman K. Denzin -- "Radical" and "symbolic" interactionism : demarcating their borders / Lonnie H. Athens -- Mead's conception of the social act : a radical interactionist's critique / Lonnie H. Athens -- Toward a radical interactionist account of science / Antony J. Puddephatt -- Domination and resistance : the political theory of John Dewey / Gil Richard Musolf -- Revisiting learning to labor / Matthew Gougherty, Tim Hallett -- Dominance, deference, and demeanor in mad men / Michael A. Katovich -- Reflections on power and intersectionality / Caroline Joan S. Picart -- The best road for pragmatism : neo-pragmatism or radical interactionism? / James A. Shaw.

This issue focuses on "radical interactionism". which recent emergence as an alternative perspective to conventional symbolic interactionism has sparked fierce debate in both North America and Europe. Lonnie Athens discusses the four fundamental differences between radical and conventional symbolic interactionism. The prominent scholars compare the relative insights offered not only between radical interactionism and symbolic interactionism, but between radical interactionism and feminism, dramaturgy, critical studies, and neo-pragmatism. Without exception, they found the radical interactionism revealed new and formidable insights that improved our general understanding of human group life and critical problems that arise during it. While some contributors believe that radical interactionism marks the development of a new and more vibrant form of interactionism which in due time will replace its much older and more conservative cousin, others believe that it only signals the need for traditional interactionists to finally start making some much-needed modifications in symbolic interactionism if they wish it to remain a viable sociological perspective in the 21st century.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
Last Updated on September 15, 2019
© Dhaka University Library. All Rights Reserved|Staff Login